Published 8 October 2007
analysts , architecture , enterprisey
I’m struck by the continuing view of IT as a means of just keeping lights running in a business. There are no doubt many fundamentals and a fair share of IT behavior continually renews the sense of ennui that business partners feel when working with IT, but it’s not always that bad.
I was amused by an audience question from Susan Scrupski at my Office 2.0 panel about how often the panelists regarded IT as a barrier to adoption of web 2.0 initiatives. It was nice to get the question out for discussion, as it is too often taken as a given (I joked that I didn’t know what they were talking about). But there are indeed various real barriers in IT to adopting new technologies, and re-orienting thinking towards social software: preferred vendors, security concerns, and traditional thinking about productivity are among them.
But I was even more struck while doing recent research among analysts. I was researching an area that is more on the outward facing side of our business and was shocked to find little clear guidance from a certain firm I love. The analysts at that firm clearly get it – if you read their blogs they get it, and if you talk to them, they get it. So where is the research?
Keeping water off the floor of the data center and such operational concerns are the foundation of good IT and enterprise architecture. But many enterprises are evolving their IT organizations around the products and services they provide, and are blurring lines between core infrastructure and lines of business. IT is getting focus both as an area of cost control, but also an enabler for revenue growth.
Analysts should be mindful about helping companies grow the top line, not just control expense.
Technorati tags: analysts, IT, competitive advantage
Published 27 September 2007
In case anyone is interested, Burton is hiring for an Application Platform Strategies Analyst. Of course I have a strong recommendation (ahem), but unfortunately for them I am very happy with my current employer.
Maybe one of these years.
Published 28 August 2007
analysts , enterprisey
If you are a Burton Group subscriber, you might be aware that Burton is holding a telebriefing panel today on the topic of “iPhone for the Enterprise”, which should be good. It sounds like a bit of a REST/SOA point-counterpoint with some panelists stumping for the iPhone and others chopping it down.
I have not yet experience the iPhone (but will next week at Office 2.0), so don’t have an informed opinion. Everything I hear sounds like it has a rich browsing experience, and also that Apple is putting forth a good effort to build a development ecosystem around the platform. So who knows, maybe it could happen.
I still think the biggest hurdle at large companies is the perception that the iPhone is just a must-have consumer device. Of course, you can play music and video on many smartphones, but this is where Apple’s propensity to do it too much better than everyone else backfires. Do you just want to watch DVDs, or are you getting some work done?
The killer app for the iPhone, against Windows Mobile at least, is stability. If Apple can nail the stability game, go enterprisey when it comes to device management, and get a development ecosystem going, who knows…
Technorati tags: iphone enterprisey burtongroup
Published 27 June 2007
analysts , conferences
I have expressed my affection in the past for Burton Group‘s analysis and have called out certain analysts in particular such as Richard Monson-Haefel and Mike Gotta who provide world class analysis, but also very accessible blog content.
Burton might not be as radically different as my other favortite analyst firm RedMonk, but they get it. They are promoting community taggging for the Catalyst conference this week in San Francisco. I hope any bloggers in attendance pick up on this, and I hope they are making this idea prominent at the conference.
You can subscribe to the Technorati-tagged posts here.
Technorati tags: burtongroup, community, tagging, BurtonGroupCatalyst07
Published 4 May 2007
analysts , enterprisey
I made the egregious mistake of letting something like 33 Gotta posts getting stacked up in BlogLines – serious mistake if you actually want to read him. Mike has some of the meatiest posts in my sub list. More importantly, Mike actually gets the enterprise and deftly approaches many meme-quality topics with incisive analysis on what they mean to large enterprises. Welcome comfort to us enterprisey folk.
Here are a couple of great Gotta reads…
What If A “Mob” Ruled Your Company?
I sort of followed the recent Digg issue, but wasn’t as impressed as a lot of others were with Digg’s position. I actually shared Mike’s reaction to a large extent. I like the crowd, but I fear the mob. Mike is right – there is a razor thin line.
Enterprise 2.0: Honeywell Explores Value Of Intranet Tagging
Mike is one of a small handful that actually shares examples of 2.0 in the enterprise rather than just pontificating. Honeywell using Connectbeam? Cool.
Published 4 May 2007
agile , analysts , podcasts
Coté and I talked Agile the other day for an episode of RedMonk Radio. He was kind enough to invite me into the studio as a result of my recent chapter in an Agile SQA book. We started off covering TDD and the book, but quickly got in more general topics on Agile “in the wild” as Coté would say.
Coté – you self-criticize in your post about editorializing, but you actually do a good job directing a conversation and keeping it moving. Hey man, we’re in the post-modern world and interviewers are allowed to be part of the conversation. Social dichotomies are so 1.0! I did like the setup reference to your secret mental file – a special bonus to listeners who can identify that.
Technorati tags: agile, tdd, test driven development, podcast, redmonk